🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.